http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/ Multi-Purpose Librarian Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:13:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-739 Joyce Schwarz Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:16 +0000 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/#comment-739 You say that the chances are that anyone would make nay money at all form your blog is tiny -- isn't really the issue though is it? a) So hear I am an author of an upcoming book -- what if I want to include a blog post of yours in my book -- that's commercial right -- book is sold to Harper Collins. Okay so what if it's NOT you -- what if it's Scott Adams who created Dilbert -- what I put an excerpt from his blog in my book? What if like Bitacle they take your blog and put it as content on their site and sell ads on their site using your content -- every one of your blog posts Is that okay? what IS okay. Who knows what pictures are commercial or not. It's my opinion that every frame of every video and every film is monetizable. YES someone would pay some money for it somewhere? But as I see it it's probably better to let the legitimate book author include part of your blog posts for promotion for you. With appropriate attribution etc. SEE these are things that publishing company lawyers don't quite understand yet? You say that the chances are that anyone would make nay money at all form your blog is tiny — isn’t really the issue though is it? a) So hear I am an author of an upcoming book — what if I want to include a blog post of yours in my book — that’s commercial right — book is sold to Harper Collins. Okay so what if it’s NOT you — what if it’s Scott Adams who created Dilbert — what I put an excerpt from his blog in my book? What if like Bitacle they take your blog and put it as content on their site and sell ads on their site using your content — every one of your blog posts Is that okay? what IS okay. Who knows what pictures are commercial or not. It’s my opinion that every frame of every video and every film is monetizable. YES someone would pay some money for it somewhere? But as I see it it’s probably better to let the legitimate book author include part of your blog posts for promotion for you. With appropriate attribution etc. SEE these are things that publishing company lawyers don’t quite understand yet?

]]> http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-731 Ivan Chew Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:01:26 +0000 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/#comment-731 Hello again. Update: I've decided to <a href="http://ramblinglibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/08/creative-commons-connection-part-3.html" rel="nofollow">follow Paul's lead</a>. Your talk in Singapore was also the tipping point :) Hello again. Update: I’ve decided to follow Paul’s lead. Your talk in Singapore was also the tipping point

]]> http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-375 Ivan Chew Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:00:57 +0000 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/#comment-375 Hi Molly, you made a lot of sense here. You've articulated, and given insights, to my thoughts and motivations re: CC much more lucidly than I can. :) Recently I <a href="http://ramblinglibrarian.blogspot.com/2008/06/cc-singapore-license-draft-in-public.html" rel="nofollow">rationalised</a> about my use of CC. I suggested that CC gave peace of mind for people who are already interested in sharing. I guess whether BY-NC or BY only or ND -- whatever mode that provides greater peace of mind to the owner is the right sort of licence. Hi Molly, you made a lot of sense here. You’ve articulated, and given insights, to my thoughts and motivations re: CC much more lucidly than I can. Recently I rationalised about my use of CC. I suggested that CC gave peace of mind for people who are already interested in sharing. I guess whether BY-NC or BY only or ND — whatever mode that provides greater peace of mind to the owner is the right sort of licence.

]]> http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-95 Molly Fri, 09 May 2008 20:07:50 +0000 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/#comment-95 You're right, Lev! I hadn't thought of it that way, but that's exactly what I was doing. You’re right, Lev! I hadn’t thought of it that way, but that’s exactly what I was doing.

]]> http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-94 Lev Fri, 09 May 2008 19:39:18 +0000 http://mollykleinman.com/2008/04/28/the-psychology-of-creative-commons-a-response-in-two-parts/#comment-94 "...unpacking my beliefs about the meanings and significances of the different options has been very helpful..." You're sensemaking around Creative Commons! “…unpacking my beliefs about the meanings and significances of the different options has been very helpful…”
You’re sensemaking around Creative Commons!

]]>