<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CC HOWTO #3: How to use a work with a Share Alike license</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mollykleinman.com/2008/08/29/cc-howto-share-alike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mollykleinman.com/2008/08/29/cc-howto-share-alike/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrix89</title>
		<link>http://mollykleinman.com/2008/08/29/cc-howto-share-alike/comment-page-1/#comment-48604</link>
		<dc:creator>adrix89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mollykleinman.com/?p=59#comment-48604</guid>
		<description>What about video games?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about video games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://mollykleinman.com/2008/08/29/cc-howto-share-alike/comment-page-1/#comment-40282</link>
		<dc:creator>Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 16:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mollykleinman.com/?p=59#comment-40282</guid>
		<description>The phrase: &quot;The synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with a moving image (“synching”) will be considered an Adaptation for the purpose of this License.&quot;
My understanding is if the background music does not synch with the moving images then it&#039;s not called adaptation. For example: a Mozart music with a walking scene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase: &#8220;The synchronization of the Work in timed-relation with a moving image (“synching”) will be considered an Adaptation for the purpose of this License.&#8221;<br />
My understanding is if the background music does not synch with the moving images then it&#8217;s not called adaptation. For example: a Mozart music with a walking scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Myers</title>
		<link>http://mollykleinman.com/2008/08/29/cc-howto-share-alike/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mollykleinman.com/?p=59#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a really good summary of BY-SA!

The technical term for collections that don&#039;t trigger ShareAlike is a &quot;collective work&quot;.

I think (although I don&#039;t know) that the reason for having ShareAlike apply to music used in a film or video is that it fits the &quot;social contract&quot; or expectations of musicians.

It might be worth mentioning that sampling, remixing or collaging produces a derivative work, even if only part of the work is used.

And sadly the situation with whether using an image on a web page creates a derivative or not might be slightly more complex. I can&#039;t remember the details, I think two different US courts have said two different things. Ask on cc-community about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really good summary of BY-SA!</p>
<p>The technical term for collections that don&#8217;t trigger ShareAlike is a &#8220;collective work&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think (although I don&#8217;t know) that the reason for having ShareAlike apply to music used in a film or video is that it fits the &#8220;social contract&#8221; or expectations of musicians.</p>
<p>It might be worth mentioning that sampling, remixing or collaging produces a derivative work, even if only part of the work is used.</p>
<p>And sadly the situation with whether using an image on a web page creates a derivative or not might be slightly more complex. I can&#8217;t remember the details, I think two different US courts have said two different things. Ask on cc-community about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

